SP44 I always liked the SP38/13 and seeing the large ScanSpeak
D3806/8200 dome getting out of stock here and there,
John/US came in handy with a pair of Accuton C244-8 inverted domes and a pair of HIQUPHON
OWI tweeters as well, thus the SP44 project was on track.
We could also call it Ekta-Accu, but SP44 it will be.
Comparing SP44 to the Ekta is obvious and despite not
having them side by side, I'm afraid the SP44 will beat
the Ekta from a less coloured upper mid/lower treble.
These ceramic domes are something - and I find the
12M/4631G00 at 229 and the C44 at 235 , so
price is not an option here. Now,
what can the C44 do the D3806 can't? Well, it goes deeper and
it goes higher and it has a remarkable flat response all
up to 20 kHz where a serious cone break-up occurs. 20 kHz
is really high and nothing to worry about in a 3-way
system. The C44 is not particularly sensitive, around
85-86 dB/2.8 volts - but all the same a good match to the
18W/8531 driver that usually can be tuned to a system
sensitivity of 86 dB/2.8 volts. Looking at C44 horizontal
dispersion, 6 kHz seems like a good starting point for
crossing over to the tweeter, thus the C44 is really able
to handle all of the important treble range,
because we can go even lower compared to the D3806. From
simulation 900 Hz looks ideal, but no guarantee this will
also sonically make the best transition to the 18W
midbass. Has to be tried. The 18W/8531 and OWI drivers are well known from numerous constructions, so not much to add here. 8531 still the best 6-7" midbass I can think of and the OWI is the 3/4" dome where everything seems to have been done right! We need some 28-32 liter volume to please the 18W driver the best. From 32 liter we get an F3 = 39 Hz. Not many 6-7" drivers can do this. The price to pay is sensitivity being on the low side. Vent tuning is a never ending topic and anything from 28-38 Hz may do depending on taste. The higher we go, the more response we get in the 50-100 Hz range, where 28 Hz renders an almost flat response. 28 Hz is not all that easy to achieve as we need a long port in a 32 liter net volume cabinet. 70 x 290 mm - or 60 x 210 mm, the latter actually OK if we flare the vent to reduce port noise. So, why should you possibly try a design like this? 1. Well,
first of all enjoy the world of diy loudspeakers and
enjoy something you'll have to pay at least 6,000-8,000
US $ for over the counter. Finished speakers with the
current set-up come with serious price tags. 2. Next you may build this speaker because you want deep bass from a small footprint and an overall modest cabinet volume. The price to pay for this is low efficiency. Removing my DTQWTs, having been on the stand for long, was a bit shocking. Our livingroom seemed almost empty and going from a total bass radiating area of something like 1850 cm^2 to a merely 300 cm^2 for the two 8531 drivers calls for some mental preparation as well. I won't even try to describe the difference in sound, but it is huge. 3. Last but not least: To try out the ceramic drivers and hear what lack of colouration does to your music. The C44s are truly something as stated elsewhere on this page. Drivers
Cabinet
Test cabs
Initial measurements
C244-8 driver
The Crossover - Simulation
Measurements and crossover fine-tuning
Left: After
crossover assembly, the bass and mid turned out pretty
well and inverting mid polarity produced the wanted deep
suck-out, indicating point of crossover around 900 Hz.
All as predicted from LspCAD simulation. The RC circuit
across L2041 in the mid crossover was omitted.
Left: Horizontal
dispersion at 0, 10, 20, 30 mand 40 deg. An even power
response up to 10 kHz is seen over a very wide listening
area. Crossover - Simulation The sound from
crossover version #2 was indeed very promising. Lots of
detail and transparency, but also a distinct character
from the C44 working up to 6 kHz. A sound very hard to
describe. Not really fullrange kind of sound, but
slightly "cuppy", i.e. like when you hold your
hands around your mouth and speak. This doesn't appear to
be derived from a too high upper mid level, rather
limited dispersion, which is strange as the horizontal
dispersion is excellent. But measurements are one thing,
not always reflecting what we aurally perceive. At 6 kHz
we're close to where the C44 will start beaming due to
the diameter of the cone and maybe we're just pushing our
luck from taking a 2" dome this high.
Mid and tweeter attenuation Depending on your overall front end and
room acoustics, you may want to The current tuning is rather flat and you'll merciless be told how bad your - bad - CDs are.
Measurements on crossover #3, 4th order LR
Now, this all seems pretty straight forward, but how about the sound? Well, just what I had hoped for. The slight cuppy sound from the inverted dome is gone and after listening to a few vinyls and CDs, I can't help feeling this is it! Very enjoyable indeed. The 8531 - as always - delivers firm and deep bass - that is, if driven from not less than 100 watts solid state amplifier. The upper mid/lower treble? Never heard it better. These ceramic cones are something. Clean, clean, clean. Treble? The HIQUPHON is totally cool in this environment. Doing treble from 5 kHz is surely a piece of cake for this magnificient tweeter. Some comments on
crossover components.
Crossover layout:
|