JBL L100 Century Up-grade Kit
from
Jantzen Audio
The
kit is suitable for those JBL variants using the 123A
woofer,
LE5-2 midrange driver and LE25 tweeter, e.g. 4311.
For the 4310 (LE20 tweeter) you need 3 additional
components. Read below.
Response
from people buying the upgrade kit.

The James B.
Lansing L100 Century
loudspeaker, the consumer version of the 4310
studio monitor, became the largest selling
loudspeaker model of any company in the Seventies
and more than 125,000 pairs were sold. By the end
of the decade, recording studios in the United
States used more of JBLs monitors than all
other brands monitors combined. Due to the
materials used, the L100 drivers are as good
today as when they were produced, but the overall
sound can be vastly improved by modern crossover
technology. Jantzen Audio is proud to offer an
up-grade kit for this magnificient loudspeaker.
|
August 2006 -
February 2007.
While enjoying the sound from
newly renovated JBL L26
Decades, I might as well start writing
about the one and only, JBL L100
Century. A month ago one of my friends threw in
these speakers, having bought them from an old
fellow for 300 DKK (50 US $) - a total give-away.
All drivers in mint condition and the cabs with
minor scratches. Tweeter foam had gone but can
easily be replaced from eBay sellers.
I won't go into historical details on the L100 as
so much can be found at: http://audioheritage.org/html/projectmay/pmintro.htm, and in
particular about the L100 here: http://audioheritage.org/html/profiles/jbl/l100.htm
A rare opportunity to measure what the L100 did
back then where I could only dream of owing a
pair of these speakers from "over
there". I don't recall the retail price, but
they were very expensive. Having recently
experienced the SEAS 503
kit, I now realise the 503 kit was
actually a better speaker at that time. Quite
similar in size and power handling, the 503 had a
better midrange and a better crossover and the
33FWK bass drivers may beat the 123A drivers. But
the SEAS drivers didn't have the gorgeous looks
of the JBL drivers, the white-coated cone of the
bass driver and the exquisite finish of the LE5-2
driver. I've always had a week spot for the LE5-2
due to how well it is built. Take a look at how
the dust cap is glued to the cone and the fine
touch of paint around the edges. It takes great
skills to make such fine work. However, the LE5-2
is not an easy driver as we shall see later.
This first part of the
my L100 story will not engage in a new crossover,
merely try to find out what the L100 was in terms
of driver performance and crossover construction.
And we might as well take a look at the original
crossover right away, because it's simplicity
itself: 8 uF to the mid and 3 uF to the tweeter.
That's all! Both drivers connected via an L-Pad
for attenuation. Mid connected with inverted
polarity. Having a 12" bass driver running
full range is a bold choice and a lot of work
must have gone into designing the 123A driver to
produce a smooth roll off. The LE25 is a better
tweeter than we might think, maybe not from
measuring performance, but well equalised, it can
deliver some excellent treble integrating well
with midrange, actually better than many modern
domes in my opinion. I've recently bought some LE
tweeters on eBay: LE20, LE25 and LE26. Read here:
http://www.troelsgravesen.dk/JBL_LE20-25.htm,
http://www.troelsgravesen.dk/JBL_LE26.htm
Download
this article: 1.5 MB pdf file.
|

Above
my friend's JBL L100, some scratches to the cabs, but
drivers in mint condition.

Here's
my own stock drivers for recreating the JBL L100. I have
to say it's much cheaper buying an old pair of L100s
compared to buying the
drivers separately on eBay. On eBay, sellers will
completely strip an L100 speaker and sell it bit by bit
down to the pins holding the front grille.

Box simulation

Cabinet
modelling from TS-data reveals the
above seen response profile. Basically the 123A
driver has a too high Qt to be used in a vented
cabinet and the result from a 44 liter volume is
a 3-4 dB increase in response at 70 Hz, which is
confirmed by a nearfield reading of the response.
Place the classic L100 Century on the floor,
close to a wall, and we will have an overall 7 dB
response increase from 50 to 100 Hz. Talk about a
boom box! So, two options available. Add some
acoustic foam to the vent, lift the speaker some
50 cm from the floor, which will raise the bass
driver to ~70 cm from the floor, move it some 100
cm (distance to front panel) out from the rear
wall, place in on the long side of the room with
1.5-2 meters to side walls, and we will reduce
the bass peak to 3 dB above average level. Much
nicer. Placing the L100 in corners is a no-no. |

Response
in 44 liter closed box (Fb set to 1 = closed box, for the
sake of ease)
Driver performance

Left: Individual
response of drivers without crossover. Smooth bass
roll-off? Well, maybe not from this cabinet, but take a
look below where I compare the 123A response from the
L100 cab and a 60 cm wide, curved baffle.
The LE5-2 is extremely sensitive. If it hadn't been for
the dip around 1 kHz, we would have had 96-98 dB/2.8V
sensitivity. The peak at 6.5 kHz needs special attention
in the crossover construction.
The LE25 is much better than I had anticipated. It
doesn't matter much whether the foam is in place or not.
It may change the sound, but not measuring performance.
File not shown.
Right: Individual response of drivers from
original crossover with mid and tweeter attenuation set
to zero. Some serious traffic jam around 3-10 kHz - three
drivers all trying to make the most of it here. No wonder
the original set-up fails on vocal recordings.
The 123A bass drivers really shouldn't try to play upper
treble. The mid shouldn't peak at 6.5 kHz and some proper
low-end roll-off might improve performance. And the
tweeter might improve performance from smoothing overall
impedance.

Left:
The
SPL response of both speakers with "0"
attenuation for the tweeter and -3 dB attenuation for the
mid to get the terrible peak at 6.5 kHz down to
reasonable level. I found this attenuation setting to
produce the best overall balanced sound. Nearfield bass
response is merged at 350 Hz. Disregard difference in
bass response. Probably not correct.
Now, listening to some music from this setting may be
close to what we heard back then. Quite an experience to
hear that JBL L100 sound once again. Good? Hmm... Very
impressive, lots of bass, speedy midrange. The sound of
acoustic guitars is very good, but vocals? Something is
very much wrong in the treble area, the 5-10 kHz range I
guess - although I'm strongly biased due to the 6.5 kHz
peak. The danger of knowing what is going on. As soon as
you know how it performs on paper, you can't help
instantly having an opinion about what the sound is like
- and what is wrong about it. But the 6.5 kHz peak is
most likely the cause of some of the problems of this
simplistic crossover set-up. Sibilance is emphasized and
you can't attenuate the mid to get rid of the trouble
without losing tonal balance.
Right: Response of midrange alone with
crossover and attenuation set for -3 dB. Severe dip at
1300 Hz and the 6.5 kHz peak..... This looks like a
poorly managed tweeter response. A response up to 15 kHz!
I mean, a single coil to the mid might at least have
produced a more flat response, but then the upper treble
may run into trouble from this approach.
Modelling the original crossover
performance

Modelled response of
drivers where the drivers are attenuated with two
resistors in order to recreate the measured
performance. Not that easy, but this is close.
Phase tracking between bass and mid is better
that we might expect, but the tweeter is very
much living its own life in the upper midrange.
When I reverse the polarity of mid and tweeter in
the LspCAD, things at least get worse. It's not that
bad.
|

Left:
Step
response showing reverse mid polarity. The strange thing
about these drivers is that the red terminal on the 123A
bass is correct. The cone moves out when applied positive
voltage. The LE5-2 cone in moving inwards when positive
voltage is applied to the red terminal. Why would JBL do
this? To ensure correct polarity of drivers when plus
wires from crossover were connected to drivers? But the
LE5 was used in other constructions... Doesn't make
sense.
Right: Mid attenuation fixed at -3 dB and
tweeter response shown from +3 dB, 0 dB and -3 dB
settings.

Left:
Mid
response from attenuation at -3 dB, 0 dB and + 3 dB. Red
= summed response from mid attenuation at -3 dB. If you
run the L100 from "mid +3 dB" it'll rip off
your ears!
Right: The 123A bass in L100 cab, blue,
and from a wide curved baffle (red). Now, find a 12"
driver today that will perform flat up to 6 kHz and have
a smooth roll-off. Remarkable!
The LE5-2 middrivers:

Left:
I
have two LE5-2 drivers asigned my future L100
reconstruction. So my friend's L100 gave me an
opportunity to compare four LE5-2 drivers - and there
some difference! In the upper midrange we have some 4 dB
difference in sensitivity. Basically this is due to
differences in voice coil impedance.
Right: Impedance of four LE5-2 drivers.
From 5 to 7 ohms. Unfortunately both my friend and I have
one of each and the cones are so different in colour that
we can't swap drivers. If you ever buy LE5-2 drivers on
eBay, be sure to have a DCR reading of both drivers
before bidding.
A new crossover designed for all variants of LE5-2
drivers is a challenge and fortunately it can be done due
to the very high sensitivity of the middriver. Placing a
resistor before the driver will increase impedance and
the kit crossover will have a deviation in midrange level
of +/- 1 dB from the shown drivers. This is manageable
and for those who want to do some fine-tuning, the mid
level may be increased or decreased by the input
resistor. Problem solved.
New crossover design
criteria
A lot of work has gone
into designing a new
crossover and numerous simulations and actual
crossover constructions have been tried in order
to try taming the LE5-2 middriver and provide an
overall balanced sound from the L100.
What I wanted was to maintain the basic virtues
of the L100, i.e. the 123A bass driver working -
almost - full range, thus a 1st order filter was
soon in place. To maintain 1st order filtering as
high up in frequency as possible, the LE5-2 had
an LCR circuit to flatten the rise in impedance
at Fs, allowing the high-pass section to be one
single capacitor. To cope with amplitude and
phase between mid and tweeter, the mid needs a
2nd order low-pass section and the LE25 needs a
3rd order filter at 5 kHz to get amplitude and
phase in place. See graphs below.
Three significant things have
happened here: First of all, the LE5-2 middriver
no longer peaks at 6.5 kHz. Secondly the
mid-section was constructed in such a way that
the common variation in driver impedance (LE5-2)
only produce minor deviation from target
response. Last but not least, both the tweeter
and mid now produce a smooth roll-off below
points of crossover.
Should you want to increase mid and tweeter
levels, you may bypass R2011 (mid) and increase
R1061 (tweeter) from 4R7 to 5R6. Both 4R7 and 5R6
are supplied with the kit for you to esperoiment.
|


New
crossover topology. Pay notice to terminal lay-out of JBL
drivers.
Installing the new crossover

Remove old terminals including the thin masonite panel.
Scrape off residual glue and sand the rear cabinet panel
to make a smooth surface.

Crossover
components for one speaker.


Left: Trying out the crossover/terminal board. Right: New
damping material and after installing the new crossover,
a single piece (½ roll) of
MDM3 damping material is folded and placed on top of
crossover.
The Kit

The complete kit (a pair)
includes:
1. 180 x 280 x 12 mm birch
plywood boards for terminals and crossover.
2. Terminals.
3. Two extra resistors for tweeter attenuation.
4. Soldering tag strips.
5. All crossover components: Baked non-resonant
coils, all polypropylene capacitors, MOX
resistors and cables for connecting drivers.
6. Kit instruction containing crossover
schematics, a short version of this page and
large sharp photos of the assembled crossover
board.
Not supplied is silicone glue,
screws and damping material. Damping material
takes a lot of volume and it's not such a good
idea to ship air around the world. It's highly
recommended to replace the old damping material.
I've used soft 40 mm polyurethane foam and a
sheet of MDM3. It changed the overall sound a lot
- and for the better.
The kit price is set at a level where you
cannot buy similar quality components at a lower
price from any supplier.
Contact Jantzen Audio to
kit price incl shipping and payment instructions:
contact@jantzen-audio.com


The kit.
|
4310 Speaker
The LE20 tweeter is quite different from
the LE25 and LE26 tweeters, thus needs a different
crossover.

On top of the kit you have to order: 2 x 1.0 uF CrossCap,
2 x 4.7 uF CrossCap and 2 x 0.18 mH coil, No 1072, 0.18
mH/0.33 ohm.
You have to remove all tweeter components from the kit
and use these 3 components in replacement.
Performance of new crossover

Left: L100
frequency response from new crossover. The dip at
1.3 kHz is caused by the small front panel. Some
of the LE25 tweeters display a peak at 12 kHz.
Some do not. However, I must say the treble from
the renovated L100 is remarkably smooth. If your
L25 tweeters are intact, do not discard. They're
excellent tweeters - only need a proper
crossover.
Right: Summed
frequency response, red, and response of
individual drivers from new crossover. All
drivers now display smooth roll-off
characteristics.
|

Left:The
litmus test: Reverse mid polarity. Reading taken
a 1 m distance at middriver height. Due to
placement of drivers, this reading may somewhat
depend on placement of microphone. In my own
recreation of the L100 I'll have a standard
vertical placement of drivers with mid and
tweeter slightly off-set.
Right: System
impedance from vented cabinet. This is an overall
easy load on our amplifiers. 5 ohms minimum
impedance and the negative phase angle at 70 Hz
is where impedance is high.
Final remarks to the L100:
I dare say it's
quite a different speaker compared to the
previous "two-caps" set-up. Classical
music is a delight, vocals are handled very well
and should you throw a Saturday evening party,
give it a 150 wpc amp and let it rock! It runs
well from my 20 wpc PSE valve amps, though not at
very high levels.
Thanks to Sven for
lending me his speakers for this up-grade. It's
been quite a journey and only thing remaining is
this: Should I make some radical new cabs for my
own drivers and what should it be? The high-Qt
bass driver might fit well into a TL cab
providing a smoother balance in the 50-100 Hz
range. This could be done without changing the
crossover at all. An approx. 80 liter TL
floor-stander, hmm....
One last thing: The
L100s need stands, at least 45 cm in height to
bring the 123A drivers off the floor. Remember,
the 123A is handling most of the midrange and a 5
deg. tilt is doing even better. I used the stands
I made for the
L26-3W.
Final-final...
Some comments on L100
placement: The new crossover is
tuned to a placement like most modern speakers
and due to the high-Qt bass driver we already
have some +3 dB in the 50-100 Hz range. If the
first option below is the only way you can place
your speakers, don't up-grade. We need the bass
driver up and out. From the new crossover, the
123A bass driver still handles most of the
midrange, thus 40 cm from floor level is not a
good idea. I recall studios using the 4311 and
4312 upside-down to get the 123A at ear-height.

This is a no-no with regard to
placement. Too close to the floor and front wall
and too close to the corner (for right speaker).
Based on simulation you will have +9 dB at 60-70
Hz. Way too boomy.

This German up-grader got it
right: Free of nearby boundaries and a much
smoother response.
Enjoy!
|
Response from
people buying the up-grade kit
- click heading
to go to builders' response -
|